Pte OR DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
PBT LIE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
bie eon 2 704 & COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100"
ay. ARLINGTON, VA. 22204-2490
5, Se
JET
Docket No. NROO?70-14
18 Nov 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 November 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 1 Jul
14 and HOMC memo 1000 RAP of 23 Jul 14, copies of which are
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Specifically, the Board found that your college transcript was
not determining factor in your eligibility for promotion to the
rank of sergeant. The Board further determined that your
request to have your social security number corrected on the DD
Form 215 ig an administrative matter for you to take up with
Marine Corps Headquarters. You should contact Marine Corps
Headquarters, MMSR-5 at (703) 784-9304, and they will be able to
assist you.
Under these circumstances, the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
Docket No. NROO?TVO-14
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the Bate of the Board's decision.
in wee ce
New evidence ig evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
@rror or injustice,
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL ,
Executive Director
Enclosure: 1. HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 1 Jul 14
2. HOMC memo 1000 RAP of 23 Jul 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1288 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your navai record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8441 13
Furthermore, the Board concurred with the advisory opinion that you “may request to reenlist in the Marine Corps Reserve through: — -a Prior Service Recruiter provided you meet all the requirements . Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2367 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when Docket No.NRO2367-15 applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4170-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR101 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6493 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3475 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY mean Ben ome. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2475 13
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, In addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05091-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5266 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the additional evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...